View Single Post
  #3059  
Old 02-10-2022, 05:21 AM
Joverick Joverick is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 730 / Power: 16
Joverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to beholdJoverick is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigbluebird View Post
No, you just want to sound like a nice guy and pretend all these victims didn't have it coming (especially if they are guilty in some way or another). Same logic why the police warned us not to expose valuables or large amounts of cash in public. So don't come and gong wu gong bo that such mindsets are real enablers of offenders. All that misleading, misassunption, and showcasing of wealth are the real enablers in your logic.

Hahah bro..Is it you're the perpetrator in the story and now trying to justify your actions?

Anyway, applying that same logic of yours.. If a woman covers up and behave modestly, she'll won't have it coming? Like that, wouldn't all ladies in the Middle East be safe? Since they are covered from head to toe. And yet, they still do get sexually assaulted despite their covered appearances leh. So dressing is immaterial.

If you do read up enough or even just google before replying, you would have realised that there are many studies and articles with statistics which indicates NO correlation between dressing style and being sexually assaulted. Thus, your logic is flawed sia.

It all boils down to you as a person la.
1) Your weak perception of women and disrespect to them
2) Your inability to accept No as an answer and using force to get your way if that happens