View Single Post
  #14316  
Old 01-01-2012, 02:40 PM
rahl's Avatar
rahl rahl is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 4168 / Power: 24
rahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond reputerahl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FA panel's written decision - Evra v Suarez

Quote:
Originally Posted by omnia View Post
hving done a quick skim of the FA panel's written findings...these r my preliminary views:

frankly i still don't know how you get an 8 match ban based on this FA panel's written decision???...
Bro, actually the most important point is at the end, when the commission decides how much sanction to give to Suarez. You can see then it's all about scapegoating Suarez in the name of political correctness. We will award a 2 match ban for 'normal' language that insults someone else? Then all a player or the referee needs to do is to accuse another player of calling them 'cunts', 'piss wanker' or 'joke' and the player will get banned??

At the worst, Suarez called Evra 'black'. In context, the exchange was started and taunted by Evra, who had been given the round around by Suarez the whole match. Remember also this is the Scum captain who rolled on the ground trying to cheat the ref in the same match. I acknowledge that Suarez was not calling Evra black in friendly terms, but this is a fucking contest for crying out loud between two great teams.

The length of the ban, if not the ban itself, must be appealed.

Will post some extracts from the report.