Quote:
Originally Posted by BOOBMANIAC
Yes bro I understand but sometimes collateral damage is inevitable, just like during a war. Right or wrong just depends on your perspective.
Also to emphasise again, it is not about being old and ugly which everyone is quoting. It's about the audacity to defame someone despite being subpar, especially when nothing was done to her at all.
|
Even if you have no other agenda, and you indeed do have the noblest intention, your "inevitable collateral damage" defence is fallacious. Collateral damage is only justifiable if it is the inevitable consequence of achieving a much greater goal - e.g. getting rid of the key members of an evil terrorist group resulting in a few civilian casualties.
The purported aim of your course/s of action is to rid the playground of one landmine of a ML, but it may possibly result in causing harm to other MLs in the area, plus putting a further squeeze on the availability of rooms for MLs to operate in (enforcement will render these units unsafe for further use).
Do you not understand the consequence of your stupidity? Or are you really that dumb?